Skip to content
Enterprise add-on

Structured, auditable executive due diligence.

One question, answered with evidence: has this person demonstrated the judgment, leadership and operating scale this role requires — not did they interview well.

The gated chain

Each step requires human approval of the last

These are not interface conventions. Every gate is a database constraint, and every approval is irreversible in place.

  1. Executive search

    Intake + company context

    Twenty-two intake fields across company, role and mandate, plus a web-grounded company picture. Nothing downstream can start until this is in place.

  2. Success profile

    AI-drafted · human-approved

    Mission, outcomes, capabilities, operating scale, derailers, non-negotiable gaps and weighted competencies. Generation changes nothing — the weights become operational only when a human approves them.

  3. Interview plan

    Per candidate · versioned

    Stages with objectives, interviewer roles, assigned competencies, questions, evidence to listen for and weak-answer indicators. Competency coverage is computed by the application, not claimed by the model.

  4. Assessment

    No AI on this step

    The interviewer records the evidence themselves — free text per competency and one of four levels: strong, moderate, limited, or no evidence observed. Nothing is drafted for them.

  5. Report

    Compiled from approved records

    One document, assembled only from artifacts that were approved — with a section dedicated to where the evidence is thin.

Why it holds up under scrutiny

  • Approved records are immutable

    A database trigger rejects any edit to an approved record — for every role, including the service account. Corrections create a new version and archive the old one.

  • Approval identity cannot be forged

    The approving user is derived from the session inside a database function. The client never supplies it.

  • The audit trail is append-only

    Twenty-three defined event types. No update, no delete. What happened stays on the record.

  • The application computes the facts

    Competency coverage and evidence strength are calculated server-side from approved data on every save. The agent proposes wording; it cannot influence the numbers.

A deliberate limit

Evidence strength is not a score of the candidate.

It measures how much of the role's weighted competency set has supporting evidence recorded. A high figure means the interviews covered the ground. It is not a grade, not a percentile, and not a recommendation — and the interface is built so it can never be read as one.

Executive Intelligence is contact sales — an add-on to any plan, scoped to how your firm runs diligence.

83%of weighted competencies have evidence recorded · 5 of 6
  • Scaling operationsStrong
  • Partner influenceModerate
  • Technology judgmentNone yet

Four levels, stated in words. No letter grades, no red-to-green ramp, no pass mark.

Illustrative example — not live data

Priced by engagement, not by seat.

Executive Intelligence is an enterprise add-on to any plan. Tell us how your firm runs diligence and we will scope it with you.

Contact sales